Many construction and building supplies companies are riding on the energy efficiency trend offering state of the art insulation products and materials, but how about taking sunny angles and house site positioning into account while selecting your property and building the house?
I few years ago while visiting Northern India (and the region of Ladak on an agriculture technology tour) I have noticed the local method for utilizing the sun angles for heating the house by positioning the main living room sun facing while shifting one of its sections seasonly. a satellite image of the town of Leh is showing the square houses (and the breaking of the two south facing sun-rooms)

Leh’s latitude is 34.1 north (equivalent to about 60km north of New Zealand Cape Reinga if comparing the sun rays angle relative to the equator) with extreme winter temperatures due to the high altitude of the Himalayas, the Ladakies are still utilizing the suns energy as a primary source of heating energy.

With the rise of fuel and energy costs, more people around the world are finding out that the original positioning of their house (which in many scenarios will be decided according to the surrounding views) is causing them hundreds of dollars loses for having to light and heat the house where sun energy could have been used.
We probably hear less of those features and advantages since there is no business benefit for service providers (such as building supply manufactures) on this front.
So lets do the Math:
An average north facing house site in Whitianga will receive about 2200 annual hours of sunlight(see the graph below), we will use information collected by the University of Colorado for the town of Norfolk, Virginia with the same distance from the equator (36.8 degrees) same elevation (10 meter above sea level) as Whitianga NZ, figures are average measured between 1961-1990 on a 2-Axis configuration solar panel, described later.
The daily energy harvest average for those locations (Whitianga/Norforlk) is 6.2 kWh/m2/day which is essentially means 6.2 “hours of full noontime sun per day,”
For example, the rated output of our array is 1,620 watts (1.62 kilowatts), and the average solar radiation for Whitianga/Norfolk VA is 6.2 kWh/m2/day for a 2-Axis set (described later). This gives me a theoretical power output of 10.04 kWh per day. Factoring in the system efficiency of 0.80 (the solar system energy loss) will leave us with 8.03 kWh of power per day.
This could provide 8 hours of ten 100W light bulbs worth of daily light, which is enough for a year round indoor light and fridge power of a three bedroom household.
Those feagures will be saving my family $748 NZD per year (based on 20.42 cents per kWh from my last electricity bill) for each solar cell array installed.

(image: eeca.govt.nz)
We will provide pricing charts for calculating how long will be the return on investment for a Whitianga, NZ and a Brisbane, QLD household in the following posts.